Evil Avatar

Evil Avatar (http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/index.php)
-   News Items (http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Pet Sematary Remake Trailer #PetSematary (http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256482)

Evil Avatar 10-10-2018 07:07 AM

Pet Sematary Remake Trailer #PetSematary
 

Quote:

Based on the seminal horror novel by Stephen King, Pet Sematary follows Dr. Louis Creed (Jason Clarke), who, after relocating with his wife Rachel (Amy Seimetz) and their two young children from Boston to rural Maine, discovers a mysterious burial ground hidden deep in the woods near the family’s new home. When tragedy strikes, Louis turns to his unusual neighbor, Jud Crandall (John Lithgow), setting off a perilous chain reaction that unleashes an unfathomable evil with horrific consequences.

Evil Avatar 10-10-2018 07:07 AM


BalekFekete 10-10-2018 07:26 AM

http://i.stack.imgur.com/jiFfM.jpg

This trend of remaking old movies needs to stop. Simply no reason we needed this movie done over...

Chimpbot 10-10-2018 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BalekFekete (Post 2522424)
http://i.stack.imgur.com/jiFfM.jpg

This trend of remaking old movies needs to stop. Simply no reason we needed this movie done over...

It ain't really a remake, mainly because it's another movie based on the same source material.

The '89 film hasn't aged very well at all, so I don't mind seeing a new version.

Evil Avatar 10-10-2018 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimpbot (Post 2522425)
It ain't really a remake, mainly because it's another movie based on the same source material.

The '89 film hasn't aged very well at all, so I don't mind seeing a new version.

Well, it is a remake because they already made this movie once. That's kind of the definition of a remake.

That said, the bigger question is "Why bother?" Of all of King's stories, this one just isn't that great. Unless you are a parent, the central theme of the entire story has no weight. It all hinges on the parental paranoia that you have that something will happen to your kids. Every parent has that to some degree and it's probably greatest when your kids are young.

This book came out I think when I was in my 20's, so the story just meant nothing to me. Without that parental paranoia it's just a story with a creepy kid and an annoying ghost and not even a very good story with a creepy kid and an annoying ghost. As an adult who no longer has small children, I see the story as just another trite Hollywood "child in danger" story. It's kinda lose/lose. There is only a short period in your life where this story hits home. Before and after that, it's just a slow-moving book with bad characters.

King has much better properties out there. He has an absolute mountain of short stories that would make better movies. If they have to do a remake, lets see someone really do something with Trucks (ie, Maximum Overdrive). That's a story that would be a lot of fun updated. Imagine George Miller directing Trucks.

Or how about The Jaunt. That is probably one of King's more scary properties.

Chimpbot 10-10-2018 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Avatar (Post 2522429)
Well, it is a remake because they already made this movie once. That's kind of the definition of a remake.

This would be like calling Tim Burton's version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory a remake. It wasn't, and neither is this.

It shares the same source material, though.

Quote:

That said, the bigger question is "Why bother?" Of all of King's stories, this one just isn't that great. Unless you are a parent, the central theme of the entire story has no weight. It all hinges on the parental paranoia that you have that something will happen to your kids. Every parent has that to some degree and it's probably greatest when your kids are young.

This book came out I think when I was in my 20's, so the story just meant nothing to me. Without that parental paranoia it's just a story with a creepy kid and an annoying ghost and not even a very good story with a creepy kid and an annoying ghost. As an adult who no longer has small children, I see the story as just another trite Hollywood "child in danger" story. It's kinda lose/lose. There is only a short period in your life where this story hits home. Before and after that, it's just a slow-moving book with bad characters.
It's getting a new version because it's one of his best known stories.

Quote:

King has much better properties out there. He has an absolute mountain of short stories that would make better movies. If they have to do a remake, lets see someone really do something with Trucks (ie, Maximum Overdrive). That's a story that would be a lot of fun updated. Imagine George Miller directing Trucks.

Or how about The Jaunt. That is probably one of King's more scary properties.
Something tells me we won't see Maximum Overdrive ever again, although he does make fun of it from.time to time.

brandonjclark 10-10-2018 09:27 AM

Does this mean I get to see Gage get hit by a semi again? That shit broke me when I was young.

Chief Smash 10-10-2018 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandonjclark (Post 2522439)
Does this mean I get to see Gage get hit by a semi again? That shit broke me when I was young.

I never made it past that scene when I saw it on TV a while back and that was before I had my sons. Bothered the heck out of me and it's the single biggest reason why this version is still a hard "no way" for me.

EGO 10-10-2018 11:13 AM

It makes sense to remake. Just because YOU are an old fart and have seen something, doesn't mean a new generation has seen it, know of it, or give a shit to look past all the things in the old version.

Some movies don't need "remakes" or "updates", some can benefit.

I don't think Pet Sematary is unwatchable, but I don't think it has aged well, but the source material is fine.

And I saw it LONG BEFORE I was a parent and the shit was scary (back then). The entire narrative some people have built in their heads that this story only resonates with "parents" is a farce. That's like saying Cujo only resonates with dog owners.

Terran 10-10-2018 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimpbot (Post 2522430)
This would be like calling Tim Burton's version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory a remake. It wasn't, and neither is this.

It's a remake, lol.

Sammael 10-10-2018 01:11 PM

I read this back in 1995... The scene with the casket wrecked me to my core. It was the first time I actually felt a pit in my stomach from reading a book. Say what you will of Stephen King, but this book is able to force upon the reader the despair and hopelessness that the characters feel so well to make the decisions that are made believable.

I just had a son in May, and thinking of that scene makes me feel sick. Is that normal? Being a parent opens the door to so many new feelings. Not all of them would be what I would describe as good, but I wouldn't trade it.

Chimpbot 10-10-2018 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terran (Post 2522465)

It's a new adaptation of the book, not a remake of the old movie. There's a difference, in large part because they can wholly ignore the approaches taken in the first movie.

New movie, same book as the source.

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandonjclark (Post 2522439)
Does this mean I get to see Gage get hit by a semi again? That shit broke me when I was young.

Oh, yeah. Kid's gonna get crushed.

Terran 10-10-2018 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimpbot (Post 2522477)
New movie, same book as the source.

Same story, remake. :D

DingBat 10-10-2018 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Avatar (Post 2522429)
That said, the bigger question is "Why bother?" Of all of King's stories, this one just isn't that great.

This is all that needs to be said. Thread closed.

Metal Jesus 10-10-2018 07:20 PM

I'm a huge 80s fan of Stephen King...and even I think this book was one of his weakest... I have no desire to see this...

actusoul 10-10-2018 09:18 PM

I am interested in a new "vision" of the source material. I read the book and the other Stephen King books. Most of the movie versions are terrible. The only one I liked was the Shining and King and Kubrick had a falling out. I would like to see a movie that will do the source material justice. Hopefully, this one will accomplish that. I encourage it.

BitCrash 10-11-2018 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Avatar (Post 2522429)
That said, the bigger question is "Why bother?" Of all of King's stories, this one just isn't that great. Unless you are a parent, the central theme of the entire story has no weight.

totally agree - even as a parent

Didn't like the story when I read it first, tried to read it again because people are so excited about it .... NOPE

Evil Avatar 10-11-2018 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metal Jesus (Post 2522487)
I'm a huge 80s fan of Stephen King...and even I think this book was one of his weakest... I have no desire to see this...

Same. I just look at all the other exciting stuff King has available for people to make movies out of and they always want to go back to the same well... Shining, Pet Semetary, IT, Firestarter, Hearts in Atlantis, The Stand, Tommyknockers, etc.

A shame they keep doing remakes when he has great stuff out there that hasn't been touched.

And while it is tempting to think that a Maximum Overdrive remake will not happen, I would guess that Hollywood is more likely to do a Maximum Overdrive remake than to do something original. Ha!

Terran 10-11-2018 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Avatar (Post 2522512)
A shame they keep doing remakes

It's not a remake! ;)

BeardedSonOfNel 10-12-2018 05:26 AM

Remake !


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:13 PM.