Evil Avatar  



Go Back   Evil Avatar > Daily Gaming News > News Items

» Sponsored Links


» Recent Threads
Warhammer 40,000: Dawn...
Last post by Vulture
Today 11:40 AM
9 Replies, 836 Views
Marvel Comics Gets Back...
Last post by Terran
Today 10:17 AM
13 Replies, 1,230 Views
Prey Recycle...
Last post by Mad Max RW
Today 07:28 AM
8 Replies, 966 Views
Top 10 Things to Know...
Last post by RocketMagnet
Today 06:09 AM
5 Replies, 1,026 Views
GAH!! Games that Made Us...
Last post by Terran
Today 05:59 AM
16 Replies, 1,126 Views
Weekend Headbanger -...
Last post by Emabulator
Yesterday 04:35 PM
15 Replies, 920 Views
Call of Duty WWII...
Last post by Sensei-X
Yesterday 03:09 PM
11 Replies, 1,098 Views
Gamer's Shopping Guide,...
Last post by Emabulator
Yesterday 01:23 PM
8 Replies, 2,513 Views
» Promotion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2012, 10:08 AM   #21
MrE
Low Attention Span
 
MrE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,390
I just upgraded to a single GTX680, and its plenty fast on my 30" at 2560x1600 and secondary 27" monitor.

A thousand bucks for a graphics card is nuts! But I'm willing to bet there will be various "special edition" versions that will run even more. Meh, I gave up caring about having the fastest *fill in the blank* years ago.
MrE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:10 AM   #22
Rommel
International Playboy
 
Rommel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 9,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syl View Post
Less power, heat, space? I thought that was pretty obvious.
The 680s are already well regarded for not being power hog solar flares. If anything, this card is more likely to burn the house down, as evidenced by the need to reduce its clock speed. Space I will grant you--except as Emabulator said, no one is buying $1000 of video card and going cheap on the motherboard. Baffling.
Rommel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 04:52 PM   #23
Syl
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 6,872
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rommel View Post
The 680s are already well regarded for not being power hog solar flares. If anything, this card is more likely to burn the house down, as evidenced by the need to reduce its clock speed. Space I will grant you--except as Emabulator said, no one is buying $1000 of video card and going cheap on the motherboard. Baffling.
The need to reduce the clock speed is somewhat superficial. It's still far less power than dual 680's in SLI. Likewise this card is doing the same thing that the 6990 did and allowing an absolutely massive voltage hike for overclocking.
Syl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
gtx 690, nvidia

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 PM.